<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Support for High Availability / IP Failover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.linode.com/2007/11/12/support-for-high-availability-ip-failover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.linode.com/2007/11/12/support-for-high-availability-ip-failover/</link>
	<description>Announcements, news, and musings from your pals at Linode.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikhil</title>
		<link>http://blog.linode.com/2007/11/12/support-for-high-availability-ip-failover/comment-page-1/#comment-88697</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikhil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-88697</guid>
		<description>Hi 

Does linode supports &quot;Ultramonkey&quot; loadbalancing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi </p>
<p>Does linode supports &#8220;Ultramonkey&#8221; loadbalancing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linode Blog &#187; Private Back-End Network Support</title>
		<link>http://blog.linode.com/2007/11/12/support-for-high-availability-ip-failover/comment-page-1/#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>Linode Blog &#187; Private Back-End Network Support</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-772</guid>
		<description>[...] over this private network. Database replication, backups and rsync also come to mind. Oh, and IP Failover works for both public and private [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] over this private network. Database replication, backups and rsync also come to mind. Oh, and IP Failover works for both public and private [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gene203</title>
		<link>http://blog.linode.com/2007/11/12/support-for-high-availability-ip-failover/comment-page-1/#comment-726</link>
		<dc:creator>gene203</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-726</guid>
		<description>Were you working on this when I opened a ticker for this?
or you just began after and finished the job?
Either way it is amazing! I will test this feature soon.
Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were you working on this when I opened a ticker for this?<br />
or you just began after and finished the job?<br />
Either way it is amazing! I will test this feature soon.<br />
Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caker</title>
		<link>http://blog.linode.com/2007/11/12/support-for-high-availability-ip-failover/comment-page-1/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>caker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-725</guid>
		<description>[quote:24d3b1d3bb=&quot;jeffml&quot;]I assume that if we want to use this feature you&#039;ll try your best to get our redundant host in a different rack and on a different breaker?[/quote]
Absolutely.

-Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote:24d3b1d3bb="jeffml"]I assume that if we want to use this feature you&#8217;ll try your best to get our redundant host in a different rack and on a different breaker?[/quote]<br />
Absolutely.</p>
<p>-Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffml</title>
		<link>http://blog.linode.com/2007/11/12/support-for-high-availability-ip-failover/comment-page-1/#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffml</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-724</guid>
		<description>I assume that if we want to use this feature you&#039;ll try your best to get our redundant host in a different rack and on a different breaker?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume that if we want to use this feature you&#8217;ll try your best to get our redundant host in a different rack and on a different breaker?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

