<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: East Coast Datacenter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.linode.com/2007/02/18/east-coast-datacenter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.linode.com/2007/02/18/east-coast-datacenter/</link>
	<description>Announcements, news, and musings from your pals at Linode.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quik</title>
		<link>http://blog.linode.com/2007/02/18/east-coast-datacenter/comment-page-1/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>Quik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-534</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your notes c1i77, they were very helpful.. I have now migrated from Dallas to Atlanta without a hitch (thanks Tom!). Here are a few notes to supplement the ones above..

The new hosts seem to be about twice as fast as the old Dallas hosts, judging by the significant drop I&#039;ve observed in the dashboard CPU graphs (my Linode is still running exactly the same services and under the same load).

It is a good idea to run a grep on your entire /etc directory for your old IPs before migrating. I had bound a number of services (apache, mysql) to specific IP addresses and had also configured manual networking - all these things needed changing.

The filtered ports at Atlanta are an issue. Be sure to check the  [url=http://www.linode.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2625]list[/url] before migrating, and remember that they apply to both incoming and outgoing communications.

Last (and probably least), there don&#039;t seem to be any nameservers provided by Linode at Atlanta, the nearest being at Dallas (only 30ms away anyway). I guess we could use public ones instead but I have yet to look for any of these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your notes c1i77, they were very helpful.. I have now migrated from Dallas to Atlanta without a hitch (thanks Tom!). Here are a few notes to supplement the ones above..</p>
<p>The new hosts seem to be about twice as fast as the old Dallas hosts, judging by the significant drop I&#8217;ve observed in the dashboard CPU graphs (my Linode is still running exactly the same services and under the same load).</p>
<p>It is a good idea to run a grep on your entire /etc directory for your old IPs before migrating. I had bound a number of services (apache, mysql) to specific IP addresses and had also configured manual networking &#8211; all these things needed changing.</p>
<p>The filtered ports at Atlanta are an issue. Be sure to check the  [url=http://www.linode.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2625]list[/url] before migrating, and remember that they apply to both incoming and outgoing communications.</p>
<p>Last (and probably least), there don&#8217;t seem to be any nameservers provided by Linode at Atlanta, the nearest being at Dallas (only 30ms away anyway). I guess we could use public ones instead but I have yet to look for any of these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tofu</title>
		<link>http://blog.linode.com/2007/02/18/east-coast-datacenter/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>tofu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 16:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-533</guid>
		<description>[quote:4f0f29e2c3=&quot;tofu&quot;]Caker, could you please put a test file on a server in the new datacenter, so I can test the download speed?
I live in Belgium and want to see if I get a higher speed then on host 44 where I am now.
There is not much difference in the ping (now: 126 new DC: 111)[/quote][url]http://www.linode.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2636[/url]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote:4f0f29e2c3="tofu"]Caker, could you please put a test file on a server in the new datacenter, so I can test the download speed?<br />
I live in Belgium and want to see if I get a higher speed then on host 44 where I am now.<br />
There is not much difference in the ping (now: 126 new DC: 111)[/quote][url]http://www.linode.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2636[/url]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monarch</title>
		<link>http://blog.linode.com/2007/02/18/east-coast-datacenter/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>monarch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 15:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-532</guid>
		<description>[b]Summary[/b]

It is about 64ms quicker from London to the East Coast (124ms) than the West Coast (188ms).

This is good news for European customers..!

From [b]London[/b] to [b]East Coast[/b] Linode:
[code]traceroute to 64.22.71.1 &#040;64.22.71.1&#041;, 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
 1  laptop &#040;192.168.0.9&#041;  2.283 ms  0.617 ms  0.616 ms
 2  192.168.1.1 &#040;192.168.1.1&#041;  8.021 ms  3.058 ms  2.635 ms
 3  89.242.240.1 &#040;89.242.240.1&#041;  31.365 ms *  31.854 ms
 4  lg-200-413.rtr001.bre.opaltelecom.net &#040;62.24.252.69&#041;  33.163 ms  32.697 ms  34.440 ms
 5  gig-9-1-rtr001.hex.opaltelecom.net &#040;62.24.254.10&#041;  32.868 ms  60.527 ms  33.895 ms
 6  gig0-1-rtr002.hex.opaltelecom.net &#040;62.24.196.38&#041;  36.238 ms  33.155 ms  34.158 ms
 7  195.66.226.167 &#040;195.66.226.167&#041;  33.729 ms  34.509 ms  84.530 ms
 8  gnax.ge2-3.br01.atl01.pccwbtn.net &#040;63.216.31.158&#041;  122.409 ms  120.595 ms  122.019 ms
 9  atl-core-e-gi4-4.gnax.net &#040;209.51.131.30&#041;  122.759 ms  122.463 ms  122.824 ms
10  atl-core-a-tgi2-1.gnax.net &#040;209.51.149.105&#041;  122.064 ms  173.207 ms  121.832 ms
11  l3-atl-18.gnax.net &#040;209.51.131.74&#041;  122.770 ms  122.131 ms *[/code]

From [b]London[/b] to [b]West Coast[/b] Linode:
[code]traceroute to ns.tuberant.com &#040;64.62.190.85&#041;, 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
 1  laptop &#040;192.168.0.9&#041;  1.499 ms  24.136 ms  24.991 ms
 2  192.168.1.1 &#040;192.168.1.1&#041;  3.168 ms  2.869 ms  2.469 ms
 3  89.242.240.1 &#040;89.242.240.1&#041;  34.192 ms  36.496 ms  33.288 ms
 4  lg-200-413.rtr001.bre.opaltelecom.net &#040;62.24.252.69&#041;  42.925 ms  31.588 ms  32.567 ms
 5  * gig-9-1-rtr001.hex.opaltelecom.net &#040;62.24.254.10&#041;  33.238 ms  33.824 ms
 6  gig0-0-rtr002.hex.opaltelecom.net &#040;62.24.196.34&#041;  33.830 ms  32.489 ms  31.438 ms
 7  lon.he.net &#040;195.66.226.21&#041;  34.262 ms  52.737 ms  34.409 ms
 8  pos4-1.gsr12416.nyc.he.net &#040;216.218.200.101&#041;  193.600 ms  115.531 ms  204.243 ms
 9  pos11-0.gsr12416.pao.he.net &#040;216.218.227.225&#041;  189.209 ms  187.628 ms  186.765 ms
10  pos5-0.gsr12416.fmt.he.net &#040;216.218.229.33&#041;  186.706 ms  187.115 ms  209.602 ms
11  216.218.217.182 &#040;216.218.217.182&#041;  186.483 ms  199.948 ms  196.921 ms
12  li3-85.members.linode.com &#040;64.62.190.85&#041;  187.769 ms  187.837 ms  186.804 ms[/code]

[i]Update[/i]: corrected some spelling</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[b]Summary[/b]</p>
<p>It is about 64ms quicker from London to the East Coast (124ms) than the West Coast (188ms).</p>
<p>This is good news for European customers..!</p>
<p>From [b]London[/b] to [b]East Coast[/b] Linode:<br />
[code]traceroute to 64.22.71.1 &#40;64.22.71.1&#41;, 30 hops max, 38 byte packets<br />
 1  laptop &#40;192.168.0.9&#41;  2.283 ms  0.617 ms  0.616 ms<br />
 2  192.168.1.1 &#40;192.168.1.1&#41;  8.021 ms  3.058 ms  2.635 ms<br />
 3  89.242.240.1 &#40;89.242.240.1&#41;  31.365 ms *  31.854 ms<br />
 4  lg-200-413.rtr001.bre.opaltelecom.net &#40;62.24.252.69&#41;  33.163 ms  32.697 ms  34.440 ms<br />
 5  gig-9-1-rtr001.hex.opaltelecom.net &#40;62.24.254.10&#41;  32.868 ms  60.527 ms  33.895 ms<br />
 6  gig0-1-rtr002.hex.opaltelecom.net &#40;62.24.196.38&#41;  36.238 ms  33.155 ms  34.158 ms<br />
 7  195.66.226.167 &#40;195.66.226.167&#41;  33.729 ms  34.509 ms  84.530 ms<br />
 8  gnax.ge2-3.br01.atl01.pccwbtn.net &#40;63.216.31.158&#41;  122.409 ms  120.595 ms  122.019 ms<br />
 9  atl-core-e-gi4-4.gnax.net &#40;209.51.131.30&#41;  122.759 ms  122.463 ms  122.824 ms<br />
10  atl-core-a-tgi2-1.gnax.net &#40;209.51.149.105&#41;  122.064 ms  173.207 ms  121.832 ms<br />
11  l3-atl-18.gnax.net &#40;209.51.131.74&#41;  122.770 ms  122.131 ms *[/code]</p>
<p>From [b]London[/b] to [b]West Coast[/b] Linode:<br />
[code]traceroute to ns.tuberant.com &#40;64.62.190.85&#41;, 30 hops max, 38 byte packets<br />
 1  laptop &#40;192.168.0.9&#41;  1.499 ms  24.136 ms  24.991 ms<br />
 2  192.168.1.1 &#40;192.168.1.1&#41;  3.168 ms  2.869 ms  2.469 ms<br />
 3  89.242.240.1 &#40;89.242.240.1&#41;  34.192 ms  36.496 ms  33.288 ms<br />
 4  lg-200-413.rtr001.bre.opaltelecom.net &#40;62.24.252.69&#41;  42.925 ms  31.588 ms  32.567 ms<br />
 5  * gig-9-1-rtr001.hex.opaltelecom.net &#40;62.24.254.10&#41;  33.238 ms  33.824 ms<br />
 6  gig0-0-rtr002.hex.opaltelecom.net &#40;62.24.196.34&#41;  33.830 ms  32.489 ms  31.438 ms<br />
 7  lon.he.net &#40;195.66.226.21&#41;  34.262 ms  52.737 ms  34.409 ms<br />
 8  pos4-1.gsr12416.nyc.he.net &#40;216.218.200.101&#41;  193.600 ms  115.531 ms  204.243 ms<br />
 9  pos11-0.gsr12416.pao.he.net &#40;216.218.227.225&#41;  189.209 ms  187.628 ms  186.765 ms<br />
10  pos5-0.gsr12416.fmt.he.net &#40;216.218.229.33&#41;  186.706 ms  187.115 ms  209.602 ms<br />
11  216.218.217.182 &#40;216.218.217.182&#41;  186.483 ms  199.948 ms  196.921 ms<br />
12  li3-85.members.linode.com &#40;64.62.190.85&#41;  187.769 ms  187.837 ms  186.804 ms[/code]</p>
<p>[i]Update[/i]: corrected some spelling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tofu</title>
		<link>http://blog.linode.com/2007/02/18/east-coast-datacenter/comment-page-1/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>tofu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 19:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-531</guid>
		<description>Caker, could you please put a test file on a server in the new datacenter, so I can test the download speed?
I live in Belgium and want to see if I get a higher speed then on host 44 where I am now.
There is not much difference in the ping (now: 126 new DC: 111)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caker, could you please put a test file on a server in the new datacenter, so I can test the download speed?<br />
I live in Belgium and want to see if I get a higher speed then on host 44 where I am now.<br />
There is not much difference in the ping (now: 126 new DC: 111)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c1i77</title>
		<link>http://blog.linode.com/2007/02/18/east-coast-datacenter/comment-page-1/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>c1i77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 05:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-530</guid>
		<description>[quote:4c48e3bc11=&quot;SteveG&quot;]I assume that&#039;s a typo for 86400 = 1 day?[/quote]

Yes, you&#039;re right. Thanks for the heads-up -- I had in fact repeated it in my DNS. :oops:

Now set to the proper number for one day: 86400

Cliff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote:4c48e3bc11="SteveG"]I assume that&#8217;s a typo for 86400 = 1 day?[/quote]</p>
<p>Yes, you&#8217;re right. Thanks for the heads-up &#8212; I had in fact repeated it in my DNS. <img src='http://blog.linode.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_redface.gif' alt=':oops:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Now set to the proper number for one day: 86400</p>
<p>Cliff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveG</title>
		<link>http://blog.linode.com/2007/02/18/east-coast-datacenter/comment-page-1/#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-529</guid>
		<description>[quote:a0d209275a=&quot;c1i77&quot;]
(Lots of good stuff I snipped)

* After migrating, set TTL in DNS SOA to a more reasonable number again (e.g. 8600 = 1 day).[/quote]

I assume that&#039;s a typo for 86400 = 1 day?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote:a0d209275a="c1i77"]<br />
(Lots of good stuff I snipped)</p>
<p>* After migrating, set TTL in DNS SOA to a more reasonable number again (e.g. 8600 = 1 day).[/quote]</p>
<p>I assume that&#8217;s a typo for 86400 = 1 day?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c1i77</title>
		<link>http://blog.linode.com/2007/02/18/east-coast-datacenter/comment-page-1/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>c1i77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-528</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I just migrated my bundle of images to Atlanta. SSH&#039;ing feels a lot snappier than Amsterdam&lt;-&gt;Fremont. 

FWIW, for others who are thinking of migrating their Linode(s), here are some of the notes I made:

* See Aaron&#039;s post about  [url=http://www.linode.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2625]&quot;Filtered ports at new datacenter&quot;[/url].

* Prior to starting migration, set TTL in DNS to a low number for affected domains (Zoneedit.com permits a TTL 1200 [20mins] under &quot;Configure SOA&quot;). Ideally, wait for old TTL to expire before commencing the migration.

* transfer rate -- between 0800 and 1000 UTC -- Fremont -&gt; Atlanta was roughly 40-50MB/min (1GB ~25mins) .

* disk image transfers are uncompressed, so shrink underutilized disk images to speed up the migration.

* New hosts are Ubuntu-based 
(Linux hostXX.atlanta.linode.com 2.6.16.36-2-bigmem #1 SMP Tue Dec 26 13:58:52 EST 2006 i686 GNU/Linux).

* Reverse DNS and authorized keys have to be set again.

* After migrating, set TTL in DNS SOA to a more reasonable number again (e.g. 8600 = 1 day).

[EDIT: Feb-22]

* Replaced ftp.us.debian.org in /etc/apt/sources.list with http://ftp-mirror.internap.com/pub/debian/ -- a mere 3.2ms ping time away. This source also mirrors Ubuntu.)


Cliff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I just migrated my bundle of images to Atlanta. SSH&#8217;ing feels a lot snappier than Amsterdam&lt;-&gt;Fremont. </p>
<p>FWIW, for others who are thinking of migrating their Linode(s), here are some of the notes I made:</p>
<p>* See Aaron&#8217;s post about  [url=http://www.linode.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2625]&quot;Filtered ports at new datacenter&quot;[/url].</p>
<p>* Prior to starting migration, set TTL in DNS to a low number for affected domains (Zoneedit.com permits a TTL 1200 [20mins] under &quot;Configure SOA&quot;). Ideally, wait for old TTL to expire before commencing the migration.</p>
<p>* transfer rate &#8212; between 0800 and 1000 UTC &#8212; Fremont -&gt; Atlanta was roughly 40-50MB/min (1GB ~25mins) .</p>
<p>* disk image transfers are uncompressed, so shrink underutilized disk images to speed up the migration.</p>
<p>* New hosts are Ubuntu-based<br />
(Linux hostXX.atlanta.linode.com 2.6.16.36-2-bigmem #1 SMP Tue Dec 26 13:58:52 EST 2006 i686 GNU/Linux).</p>
<p>* Reverse DNS and authorized keys have to be set again.</p>
<p>* After migrating, set TTL in DNS SOA to a more reasonable number again (e.g. 8600 = 1 day).</p>
<p>[EDIT: Feb-22]</p>
<p>* Replaced <a href="http://ftp.us.debian.org" rel="nofollow">http://ftp.us.debian.org</a> in /etc/apt/sources.list with <a href="http://ftp-mirror.internap.com/pub/debian/" rel="nofollow">http://ftp-mirror.internap.com/pub/debian/</a> &#8212; a mere 3.2ms ping time away. This source also mirrors Ubuntu.)</p>
<p>Cliff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xan</title>
		<link>http://blog.linode.com/2007/02/18/east-coast-datacenter/comment-page-1/#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>Xan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-527</guid>
		<description>tasaro,

I haven&#039;t had a chance to say welcome, and how it&#039;s nice to have another Linode staff member to help us out around here.

I&#039;d like to suggest that you pick some distinctive avatar for the forums.  We can all recognize Caker and Mike at a glance.  My first reaction to your post here was &quot;why would this guy know anything about it&quot; until I caught the &quot;Linode Staff&quot; by your name.  An avatar we could recognize would really help us to know when we&#039;re seeing an &quot;official&quot; response.

Edit: Funny, mine&#039;s not showing up on this post, and I can&#039;t go look at my profile without a prompt.  Maybe there&#039;s some problem with the forum at the moment, and if so, please ignore me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tasaro,</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t had a chance to say welcome, and how it&#8217;s nice to have another Linode staff member to help us out around here.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to suggest that you pick some distinctive avatar for the forums.  We can all recognize Caker and Mike at a glance.  My first reaction to your post here was &quot;why would this guy know anything about it&quot; until I caught the &quot;Linode Staff&quot; by your name.  An avatar we could recognize would really help us to know when we&#8217;re seeing an &quot;official&quot; response.</p>
<p>Edit: Funny, mine&#8217;s not showing up on this post, and I can&#8217;t go look at my profile without a prompt.  Maybe there&#8217;s some problem with the forum at the moment, and if so, please ignore me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tasaro</title>
		<link>http://blog.linode.com/2007/02/18/east-coast-datacenter/comment-page-1/#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator>tasaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-526</guid>
		<description>This is [b]not[/b] the major announcement hinted at within the RAM upgrade thread. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is [b]not[/b] the major announcement hinted at within the RAM upgrade thread. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ross</title>
		<link>http://blog.linode.com/2007/02/18/east-coast-datacenter/comment-page-1/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-525</guid>
		<description>Is this the major announcement hinted at within the RAM upgrade thread?

No complaints, just wondering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this the major announcement hinted at within the RAM upgrade thread?</p>
<p>No complaints, just wondering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

