Comments on: Fedora updated to Fedora Core 2 (FC2) http://blog.linode.com/2004/09/14/fedora-updated-to-fedora-core-2-fc2/ Announcements, news, and musings from your pals at Linode.com Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:18:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: caker http://blog.linode.com/2004/09/14/fedora-updated-to-fedora-core-2-fc2/comment-page-1/#comment-289 caker Sat, 18 Sep 2004 20:53:31 +0000 #comment-289 [quote:b90fb03bdb="noderat"]I'm not really a fan of FC/Redhat but it seems logitcal to supply FC1 as well as FC2 if your supplying old RH versions.[/quote] Done! -Chris [quote:b90fb03bdb="noderat"]I’m not really a fan of FC/Redhat but it seems logitcal to supply FC1 as well as FC2 if your supplying old RH versions.[/quote]
Done!

-Chris

]]> By: noderat http://blog.linode.com/2004/09/14/fedora-updated-to-fedora-core-2-fc2/comment-page-1/#comment-288 noderat Sat, 18 Sep 2004 20:41:12 +0000 #comment-288 I'm not really a fan of FC/Redhat but it seems logitcal to supply FC1 as well as FC2 if your supplying old RH versions. I’m not really a fan of FC/Redhat but it seems logitcal to supply FC1 as well as FC2 if your supplying old RH versions.

]]> By: sweh http://blog.linode.com/2004/09/14/fedora-updated-to-fedora-core-2-fc2/comment-page-1/#comment-287 sweh Fri, 17 Sep 2004 22:18:46 +0000 #comment-287 [quote:733db60b54="caker"]I've updated the Fedora distro for Fedora Core 2. The minimum size increased a little bit to 630MB. If you plan on using this with a 2.6 kernel, make sure to "mv /lib/tls /lib/tls-disabled" until UML fully supports NPTL.[/quote] You've <i>removed</i> FC1 from the list of choices? Hmm. So I can no longer rebuild my linode back to how it was, if I needed to? You have RH8 and 9, and Slackware 9 and 10, would it be possible to have FC1 and FC2 ? [quote:733db60b54="caker"]I’ve updated the Fedora distro for Fedora Core 2. The minimum size increased a little bit to 630MB. If you plan on using this with a 2.6 kernel, make sure to “mv /lib/tls /lib/tls-disabled” until UML fully supports NPTL.[/quote]
You’ve <i>removed</i> FC1 from the list of choices? Hmm. So I can no longer rebuild my linode back to how it was, if I needed to? You have RH8 and 9, and Slackware 9 and 10, would it be possible to have FC1 and FC2 ?

]]> By: fajar http://blog.linode.com/2004/09/14/fedora-updated-to-fedora-core-2-fc2/comment-page-1/#comment-286 fajar Thu, 16 Sep 2004 04:43:56 +0000 #comment-286 [quote:4b8769ef90="caker"]And moving /lib/tls fixes that problem?[/quote] /lib/tls and /usr/lib/tls. MySQL seems OK with just /lib/tls moved, but BIND still keeps dying at random times until I also moved /usr/lib/tls [quote:4b8769ef90="caker"]And moving /lib/tls fixes that problem?[/quote]
/lib/tls and /usr/lib/tls.
MySQL seems OK with just /lib/tls moved, but BIND still keeps dying at random times until I also moved /usr/lib/tls

]]> By: bjohnson http://blog.linode.com/2004/09/14/fedora-updated-to-fedora-core-2-fc2/comment-page-1/#comment-285 bjohnson Thu, 16 Sep 2004 01:36:30 +0000 #comment-285 [quote:c33378914c="caker"]I've updated the Fedora distro for Fedora Core 2. The minimum size increased a little bit to 630MB. If you plan on using this with a 2.6 kernel, make sure to "mv /lib/tls /lib/tls-disabled" until UML fully supports NPTL. [img]http://fedora.redhat.com/images/header-fedora_logo.png[/img] -Chris[/quote] You can also downgrade your glibc-*.i686.rpm to glibc-*.i386.rpm. This has had no ill effects for me and I don't have to worry about yum upgrading glibc and replacing the /lib/tls directory. If you are going to try FC3 (test) this will not work since the i386 rpm seems to contain the tls libraries. [quote:c33378914c="caker"]I’ve updated the Fedora distro for Fedora Core 2. The minimum size increased a little bit to 630MB. If you plan on using this with a 2.6 kernel, make sure to “mv /lib/tls /lib/tls-disabled” until UML fully supports NPTL.

[img]http://fedora.redhat.com/images/header-fedora_logo.png[/img]

-Chris[/quote]

You can also downgrade your glibc-*.i686.rpm to glibc-*.i386.rpm. This has had no ill effects for me and I don’t have to worry about yum upgrading glibc and replacing the /lib/tls directory.

If you are going to try FC3 (test) this will not work since the i386 rpm seems to contain the tls libraries.

]]> By: caker http://blog.linode.com/2004/09/14/fedora-updated-to-fedora-core-2-fc2/comment-page-1/#comment-284 caker Wed, 15 Sep 2004 06:11:10 +0000 #comment-284 [quote:871a43d58e="fajar"]I believe you should also move /usr/lib/tls to /usr/lib/tls-disabled. I didn't do that previously and my BIND keeps dying.[/quote] And moving /lib/tls fixes that problem? [quote:871a43d58e="fajar"]I believe you should also move /usr/lib/tls to /usr/lib/tls-disabled.
I didn’t do that previously and my BIND keeps dying.[/quote]
And moving /lib/tls fixes that problem?

]]> By: fajar http://blog.linode.com/2004/09/14/fedora-updated-to-fedora-core-2-fc2/comment-page-1/#comment-283 fajar Wed, 15 Sep 2004 05:59:44 +0000 #comment-283 I believe you should also move /usr/lib/tls to /usr/lib/tls-disabled. I didn't do that previously and my BIND keeps dying. I believe you should also move /usr/lib/tls to /usr/lib/tls-disabled.
I didn’t do that previously and my BIND keeps dying.

]]>